<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">A DP who doesn't speak to the talent?Originally posted by Nigel:
I take offence to being basically turned into a Monkey.
As a DP I leave a very big mark on the film. I don't just tell the director what lens to use. Actually it is far deeper than that. I am in control of the enitre image. The director is in control of the actors and the story. I will tell the gaffer what I want to do with the light--Remember without light you have no image. I will tell the grips where to set B-Board and Cookies. It is my decision as to pulling focus and how to move the camera. I will never tell the director that the actor's performance was bad and it needs to be reshot--He will never tell me that he doesn't like the lighting on the table.
There are boundries that have been created like it or not. In the Hollywood model in which I work--The DP has a wonderful position. I can claim credit when the picture does well and hide when it does poorly--Why?? Because We/I work in a Director-Centric world. Which is why everyone wants to be one.
The DP is not just a glorified camera operator. He/She is responsible for everything that people go to the cinema to do--Watch. They Watch/See a movie. They are there to see an image--I create that image. I work my A$$ off to make that image as best I can. For Me--Not for a director.
I think that to many directors try to touch the camera and do my job. I don't talk to actors--Directors don't touch my camera.
Good Luck
[img]eek.gif[/img] Each to their own, I guess. Personally, most of my best work has been through talking to actors, as has letting the director operate, if that's what they want. I agree with everything else you said on the issue, however.
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ December 23, 2004 05:17 PM: Message edited by: tim partridge ]</font>





Bookmarks